Author |
Message |
   
Dotx
New member Username: Dotx
Post Number: 1 Registered: 02-2012
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 - 12:40 am: | |
I don't have much information about this watch. It belonged to my grandmother. It's gold (my guess is not just gold-platted). I'd like to know more about it. Not only its value but whatever information you can share about it. Thanks!    |
   
Dotx
New member Username: Dotx
Post Number: 2 Registered: 02-2012
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 - 09:02 am: | |
The second picture looks really cloudy but that's from the camera, not the actual watch. The watch is in great condition. And I probably should've said vintage rather than antique. |
   
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 5547 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, February 25, 2012 - 09:17 am: | |
It is of very low value, it's not gold and there is no demand for small ladies watches. |
   
Dotx
New member Username: Dotx
Post Number: 3 Registered: 02-2012
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Sunday, February 26, 2012 - 04:53 am: | |
Thanks for the response. It is gold, though (I found out yesterday). Only the back is stainless steel. Any idea how old it is? 1960s? |
   
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 5549 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, February 28, 2012 - 08:22 am: | |
Probably 1960s. When the back is marked "stainless steel back" the top is usually gold plated, not solid. Of course there are exceptions, but that's the general rule. Value is that of the gold. |