Author |
Message |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Winston Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, July 01, 2006 - 06:50 am: | |
1965-66 Omega Seamaster Chronograph 321 Caliber Original dial and movement signed 4x VG condition with minor brassing 36 mm diameter(- crown) x 42 mm 18 mm lug spacing How much should I spend? Thanks, Fat Albert |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 2018 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, July 01, 2006 - 10:00 am: | |
About $1250 if the plating isn't too beat up |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Winston Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, July 01, 2006 - 10:30 am: | |
Thanks Zaf. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 2019 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, July 01, 2006 - 10:35 am: | |
Keep in mind gold plated ones fetch a lot less than steel or solid gold. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
john daniels Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 - 02:36 pm: | |
How does this late 321 pricing compare to earlier 321 seamaster chronograph models, such as the 321 made in the 1960. similar to http://biphome.spray.se/maciej.kosinski/Seachro61/seachro61.html |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 2143 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 - 02:57 pm: | |
What metal are we talking about? That will be the primary price factor. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
john daniels Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 - 03:01 pm: | |
gold plated, not flawless but usable unrestored. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
john daniels Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 - 03:20 pm: | |
sorry, had a look at some of your earlier postings. the material is probably gold shell. thicker than plating, but not solid gold. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 2144 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 - 03:24 pm: | |
Maybe slightly more than electroplate, but not much. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
john daniels Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 - 03:39 pm: | |
so the model itself or a bit older age does not bring any more value? the dial and indicator seem to differ between later and earlier models. the watch is actually very similar in condition to the one that the article is about(pre restored). although this watch is mechanically in good condition and working also the dial is in good shape. any rough estimate for the value? thanks for your comments |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 2145 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 - 03:43 pm: | |
A photo really helps, there is a lot of variety here. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
john daniels Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 - 03:58 pm: | |
sorry, no digital camera at the moment... |