Author |
Message |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eadc/9eadc1b491095980313a1ab7e9c005649dd0ef58" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec03e/ec03e6893f5109314e829367c20cb4ab07dc8cd2" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b54/33b549f72a930bb1b80ffff6fae81e7ea03bbd2d" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e38/a4e3825798e5f1c99c7250a724396a2ecdb79bf9" alt="Link to this message"
Rjs
New member Username: Rjs
Post Number: 2 Registered: 08-2007
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 09:36 am: | |
Hello, could someone please evaluate this watch. It is 18k WG hinged case. No stem or crown but does run. Movement 17j, 2 pos adj and temp. Serial#4466496. Case is hinged in 18k white gold. Lug to lug 1 1/2" by 7/8". Thank you.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/954e9/954e97d934714275247283631903b3fcd2feb4cb" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eadc/9eadc1b491095980313a1ab7e9c005649dd0ef58" alt="Top of page" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec03e/ec03e6893f5109314e829367c20cb4ab07dc8cd2" alt="Previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b54/33b549f72a930bb1b80ffff6fae81e7ea03bbd2d" alt="Next message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e38/a4e3825798e5f1c99c7250a724396a2ecdb79bf9" alt="Link to this message"
Blgg
New member Username: Blgg
Post Number: 107 Registered: 04-2007
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 11:32 am: | |
Movement Serial #4466496 = 1925. In this period, Longines, at least at times, printed the same # on both case and movement, which is nice - you know movement is original to case. Can't tell at this distance for sure if dial is original or old redial - but it looks good to me, in this respect. That said, the dial is pretty far gone - and not a good candidate in this regard -- also,at 22mm, not a 'fashionable' shape or size, in my view -- likely not a candidate for appreciation, if that is your concern. Nice hands. Case - though Au - is, to me, unremarkable. -- for what little it may be worth :-) |
|