Author |
Message |
   
Iris
New member Username: Iris
Post Number: 2 Registered: 03-2012
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, March 29, 2012 - 09:41 am: | |
Is this watch genuine? My concern is I do not see serial number and I am not sure if a master mariner in the 60s should have movement 481. I saw one like this with calibre K881
   |
   
Iris
New member Username: Iris
Post Number: 3 Registered: 03-2012
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, March 29, 2012 - 09:45 am: | |
forgot yo upload the dial picture
 |
   
Gatorcpa
Intermediate Member Username: Gatorcpa
Post Number: 130 Registered: 11-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, March 30, 2012 - 07:45 pm: | |
There are several things about this watch that trouble me. 1. The cal. 481 should have a power reserve window on the dial. My guess is that if you were to remove the dial, you'd see the power reserve parts. 2. LeCoultre watches from this era were generally produced for the US market. Most were cased in the USA, even those with solid gold cases. These would not have Swiss hallmarks. 3. Cases for LeCoultre were not marked "Jaeger-LeCoultre". My guess is that an acid test would find this to be a gold-filled watch case with the original US hallmarks removed. 4. Dial could possibly be genuine LeCoultre, but from after 1960, due to the general style and the "JL" logo. This looks to be a textbook "Frankenwatch". I'd run away from it as fast as possible. Hope this helps, gatorcpa |
   
Iris
New member Username: Iris
Post Number: 4 Registered: 03-2012
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, March 30, 2012 - 09:29 pm: | |
Thanks. I am running |
   
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 5578 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, March 30, 2012 - 10:08 pm: | |
Even cases for Jaeger-LeCoultre, in vintage, are not marked Jaeger-LeCoultre, but LeCoultre. I'm not sure what that case back is. It seems entirely made up. |