Lecoultre 825 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Classicwatch discussion fora » Jaeger-LeCoultre Forum » Archived Messages 2006 » Lecoultre 825 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

jaeger-lc
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, August 28, 2006 - 01:45 am:   

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110026379533&ssPageName=ADME: B:EF:US:2
Zaf, Can you verify this watch listed on ebay above to be all original? I think I see a few problems here as this reputable seller states the dial is 100% original but shouldn't the inner disk read Lecoultre Automatic? Also notice the automatic rotor bridge reads P815 which denotes no date. Any help would be appreciated?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 2109
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, August 28, 2006 - 09:26 am:   

I *REALLY* dislike commenting on other people's auctions, but yes, the caliber 815 is a no date model. Perhaps a better way for you to gather information is to ask if a cal 815 is a no date movement rather than providing an actual link to an ongoing item. Thanks. Zaf
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Polaris King
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, August 28, 2006 - 11:53 pm:   

Hello All,
We should all be academically honest. The dial is an obvious refinish (as the seller mentions in his posting.) However, the no dates are a caliber 815 and NOT an 825! The seller knows better as well!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

HerrK
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 - 10:29 am:   

Regarding the movement I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that the rotor bridge is marked P815 whilst the movement is signed K825 below the balance.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hex onX
New member
Username: Hexonx

Post Number: 155
Registered: 09-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 31, 2006 - 01:49 pm:   

Hmmm. Interesting posts. Very informative.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Polaris King
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 31, 2006 - 10:34 pm:   

Hello Everyone,
The problem with this specific watch is that the watch has been put together. The movement most likely was not original to this case and dial. The seller knows this as well as has listed the watch in such a way that the buyer's identity remains unknown so that no one can caution potential bidders.
Shame...Shame....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 2116
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 31, 2006 - 11:23 pm:   

This site isn't really intended to police people's ebay auctions, but yes, that watch does have issues. I personally will not bid on anything that has private bidders or private feedback...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hex onX
New member
Username: Hexonx

Post Number: 156
Registered: 09-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, September 01, 2006 - 10:38 am:   

I don't bid on private auctions either because
it makes me feel vulnerable and SOL if the item
that I bid on is a POS. Why? Well for example, I
have sent messages to sellers regarding discrepancies
about an item. Those that are upfront explain the
circumstances and revise. The others that are
shady ignore and most of the time it's a private
auction.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jay
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, September 01, 2006 - 12:02 pm:   

This, I believe, is what an original dial for this model should look like. It shouldn't read Memovox. lec
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hex onX
New member
Username: Hexonx

Post Number: 157
Registered: 09-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, September 03, 2006 - 12:45 pm:   

Interesting. I have never seen a JLC with the LeCoultre signature on the moving inside disc. The signature is usually around the 12oclock
area on the outer dial.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jay
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, September 03, 2006 - 04:02 pm:   

Hex, It's original! If you notice there's no room on either the top or bottom on the outer dial for the lettering. Jay
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 2122
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, September 03, 2006 - 05:33 pm:   

Definitely original, I have had that dial before. There is a huge variety in JLC/LC alarm dials. I would not make any conclusions from only seeing 3-4 of them.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hex onX
New member
Username: Hexonx

Post Number: 159
Registered: 09-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, September 04, 2006 - 10:24 am:   

I guess it's okay looking if you keep the alarm pointer at 12 Noon. :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

GregB
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, September 04, 2006 - 08:10 pm:   

Sorry for my absence. I broke my leg (tibia/fibula compound fracture) in a mountain biking accident last week and was just released from the hospital. I didn't see any of these comments while the auction was in progress.

1) I hadn't noticed the "815" signature on the bridge when handling the watch. Obviously, it was replaced by someone at some point in time with the identical bridge from it's sister movement. The watch is exactly as I purchased it.

2) The outer alarm dial is absolutely original, though I believe, as commented here, that the inner dial is not correct and has been replaced at some time. Again, the watch is exactly as I received it but I didn't inspect it carefully in my haste to get it listed.

3) I've notified the winning bidder of the discrepancies and told them that I'll gladly waive the auction results, if they want. Actually, my return policies allow a buyer to return any watch for a 100% full refund for ANY reason... even if the description were accurate. I never want someone to keep a watch that they aren't 100% happy with.

4) It's odd that not a single person in this forum bothered to write to me via the "contact seller" link to let me know if the problems. I received no e-mails whatsoever about this watch. It seems that it is much more fun to talk behind one's back and point fingers than to actually take positive action to help. Sad.

I do a lot of work on this board and others to try and help others and responsibly promote the vintage JLC brand, but it seems to have done nothing but make me a target. I'm not infallable. When I do make mistakes, I'm always willing to do the right thing. My sales policies reflect that and my regular buyers already know that I stand behind what I sell.

Greg
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

HerrK
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 05, 2006 - 08:01 am:   

Hi Greg,
I did not point my finger and did not make you a target. I was just commenting on the movement. This does not imply anything about the seller - and was not ment to.
As you are posting quite often I did not find it necessary to contact you directly. I thought you would read the posts anyway.
Christian
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

GregB
Unregistered guest

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 05, 2006 - 04:24 pm:   

Christian,

I didn't mean to imply that you, specifically, were the one who was pointing a finger. There are a couple of other posters in this thread my comments were intended for. They tend to take joy in bagging on sellers any chance they get. I've always felt that you don't lift yourself up by putting others down.

A lot of good can come from asking good questions in a public forum, but you have to be careful that the posting remains focused on examining the watch/movement and not on slinging mud at people and making fun. Certainly, if you find something unusual or wrong about an auction listing, you should ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS contact the seller for clarification or to let them know of the problem. Larger sellers have a lot on their plate and we do make mistakes.

I was in the hospital when this auction was taking place, but normally when I receive e-mail alerting me to discrepancies or problems, I will always take immediate action to modify the auction description or stop the auction entirely. When you offer a 100% satisfaction guarantee anyway, it just doesn't make any sense to have "surprises" for the buyer. As Zaf & Don or any other good seller will tell you, success comes from having loyal, repeat buyers who are happy with what they purchase and come back again and again.

Regards,

Greg