Memovox dial...refinish or redial? ... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Classicwatch discussion fora » Jaeger-LeCoultre Forum » Archived Messages 2011 » Memovox dial...refinish or redial? V-notch situation... « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Freejus
New member
Username: Freejus

Post Number: 2
Registered: 10-2011

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 14, 2011 - 05:31 pm:   

Hi all, I made this thread 5 minutes ago but it was deleted...weird.

I heard this is the best place to find some info on my JLC Memovox. As the watch was in for service the watchmaker sent me photos and I saw a v shaped notch above the 12 oclock position. I know many times this signifies a redial or restoration, however I've seen other Memovox dials with the same notch that were extremely dirty and obviously never restored. Would love some clarification.

Thanks for the help!

Pic below:

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ilja
Moderator
Username: Ilja

Post Number: 309
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, October 15, 2011 - 05:09 am:   

It looks original. The v-shaped marking is sort of a production help.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Freejus
New member
Username: Freejus

Post Number: 3
Registered: 10-2011

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, October 15, 2011 - 12:36 pm:   

Thank you for your help Ilja.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Freejus
New member
Username: Freejus

Post Number: 4
Registered: 10-2011

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, October 17, 2011 - 12:10 pm:   

Zaf, any thoughts? :-)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 5416
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, October 20, 2011 - 04:51 pm:   

Is that the same dial that was in the plastic?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Freejus
New member
Username: Freejus

Post Number: 5
Registered: 10-2011

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 21, 2011 - 06:10 am:   

Yes it is. Thanks for the reply.

The watchmaker said that the factory anti-seize was still on the screws that hold the dial to the movement and the movement itself looked as though it was never serviced. So I was 90% sure it was never refinished, but 10% is enough to keep me wondering.

Thanks.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 5417
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 21, 2011 - 06:17 am:   

It looks original though the luminous seems to have been re-applied.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Freejus
New member
Username: Freejus

Post Number: 6
Registered: 10-2011

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 21, 2011 - 07:19 am:   

Strange. Why do you think the lume dots have been changed? Too green? The original dots are radium or what? I appreciate your help.

So some of this watches did in fact have a v-notch from the factory?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 5418
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 21, 2011 - 07:23 am:   

Unless it's the lume reacting to the lighting, the color is way too green. They look normal in the first photo. The original dots are very domed in appearance, not flat. In most cases they will have darkened by now unless the dial was stored in a drawer for 50 years.

The V notch doesn't bother me. Some are like that.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Freejus
New member
Username: Freejus

Post Number: 7
Registered: 10-2011

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, October 21, 2011 - 08:16 am:   

thx!