Author |
Message |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Buzz Rickson
New member Username: Buzzrickson
Post Number: 23 Registered: 04-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Monday, May 29, 2006 - 02:34 pm: | |
just stumbled over a jlc futurematic on ebay - nice as it�s a jlc and having a steel case but the hands look unusual - maybe a frankenwatch: Item number on ebay is: 8942094354 direct link http://cgi.ebay.com/JAEGER-LECOULTRE-FUTUREMATIC-STAINLESS-STEEL-RARE-DIAL_W0QQi temZ8942094354QQcategoryZ66560QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Clavi Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Monday, May 29, 2006 - 04:15 pm: | |
yes, the hands are wrong, but I don't think it's enough to call it a frankenwatch. Just a futurematic with wrong hands ! futurematic have relatively standard dauphine hands (though rather long), and might no be so difficult to source |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Ilja Probst
Moderator Username: Ilja
Post Number: 189 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 - 06:24 am: | |
I wouldn�t call the hands *wrong*, unusual describes it better. How many European Futurematics with this particular dial layout have we seen? To me the whole watch looks legit. :-) |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Hex onX
New member Username: Hexonx
Post Number: 149 Registered: 09-2005
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 - 10:52 am: | |
I would have to agree with Ilja. The hands apparently look right for that era after finding this 1951 Memovox currently up for auction.
![](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/messages/622/7597.jpg) |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Buzz Rickson
New member Username: Buzzrickson
Post Number: 24 Registered: 04-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 - 10:53 am: | |
this watch is really a beauty with the ss case - if it had the typical futurematic hands i would place a bid. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Hex onX
New member Username: Hexonx
Post Number: 150 Registered: 09-2005
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 - 11:06 am: | |
Buzz. If the frenchman's information is true, regarding how early this futurematic is, then I would say it's pretty rare and SS. The movement does look rather clean. I do notice that the locking part looks new and of different metal stamping. It probably was replaced due to the fact that some folks damage this when opening the case wrongly. The back setting has to be set in a certain way from what I read.
![](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/messages/622/7601.jpg) ![](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/messages/622/7602.jpg) |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Buzz Rickson
New member Username: Buzzrickson
Post Number: 25 Registered: 04-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 - 01:37 pm: | |
yep the interior looks pretty clean for a watch of this age. wasn´t zaf writing this book about jlc? i hope [actually i am sure] he includes a chapter about the different futurematics. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 1978 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 - 01:41 pm: | |
I'm not convinced the hands are original to the watch. I'd expect dauphine hands with the insides cut out to take luminous material. At a minimum, I'd expect sliver colored hands, not blued steel ones, but who knows for sure. |