Author |
Message |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
watch_lover
Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, April 29, 2006 - 12:57 pm: | |
Dear all, what can you tell me about this Jaeger-LeCoultre? Solid 18K gold case. Any informations about value and age? Thank you in advance, best regards, Alexander |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
watch_lover
Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, April 29, 2006 - 01:00 pm: | |
![](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/messages/622/7370.jpg) ![](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/messages/622/7371.jpg) ![](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/messages/622/7372.jpg) Sorry, the pictures... Best regards, Alexander |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 1915 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Saturday, April 29, 2006 - 07:24 pm: | |
I'm sorry, but it is a fake. It seems to be a genuine JLC movement, that has been modified to accept a moonphase & date function. The case & dial are made up. Can you tell what the caliber number of the movement is? It should be near the balance wheel. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
GregB Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Sunday, April 30, 2006 - 04:47 am: | |
The movement looks like a typical JLC caliber 494 3-date/moonphase to me. Zaf, what clues do you look for to determine that the dial is altered on this example? I haven't had that many of them in my hands. Greg |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 1917 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Sunday, April 30, 2006 - 09:21 am: | |
The 484/494, though in the same 12 1/2 ligne movement family as the movement shown, has a 4 bridge design (this one only has 3) and the edges of the movement plates would be chamfered @ 45 degrees to accommodate the case back. Not way this is a 484/494. This looks like a caliber 449 or 463.
![](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/messages/622/7381.jpg) |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
GregB Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Sunday, April 30, 2006 - 11:16 am: | |
Thanks, I was indeed looking at a 449 tech sheet and thinking that the bridge was the same since the base caliber is the same. Greg |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
watch_lover
Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 02:59 am: | |
Hello Zaf, hello GregB, thank you for your quick response. The caliber number of the movement is 424017. Are you sure that the JLC is a fake? Or is it maybe a very rare JLC? Best regards, Alexander |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
GregB Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, May 02, 2006 - 05:03 am: | |
Alexander, The number you gave is the movement serial number, not the ovement caliber. The movement caliber will be a 3-digit number... probably 449 or 463. By the way, the serial number would date production of your watch to around 1946. Greg |