Author |
Message |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
JC Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, December 15, 2005 - 01:55 am: | |
Hello, Can anyone here tell me whether JLC produced military watches other than Mark X (479) and Mark XI (488/SBr)? If my memory serves me right, I think I used to see another JLC military watch (British) having the dial similar to that of Mark X but equiped with P800/c (seemed not be specially designed for military specifications like 479 and 488/SBr). Really no idea about it...Hope someone here could tell me something about this. Thank you and regards, JC |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Ilja Probst
Moderator Username: Ilja
Post Number: 148 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, December 15, 2005 - 06:18 am: | |
Some more military issued watches have been observed: 6b/159 using a caliber 470 US Army A.C. Weems, cal. 450 MK7A UK Weems, cal. 450 Also an UK issued pocket watch. Something that *could* be a German military contract watch, but without issue markings. Also at least one French issued to the MN. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
JC
Unregistered guest
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, December 15, 2005 - 07:39 pm: | |
Thank you, Ilja, for your input. |
|