Mens J le C Reverso Quartz Watch Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Classicwatch discussion fora » Jaeger-LeCoultre Forum » Archived messages 2010 » Mens J le C Reverso Quartz Watch « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crsuk11
New member
Username: Crsuk11

Post Number: 1
Registered: 07-2010

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, July 04, 2010 - 09:49 pm:   

I am trying to ascertain whether the quartz J le C Reverso is a good entry level J le C watch / investment. Generally I have always bought automatics, so have never thought about quartz watches. However I really like the Reverso design / appearance but cannot justify an automatic version purchase (I have quite a few watches already).
I have found a used quartz version with the 18k gold & stainless case (new J le C crocodile strap) at what seems a good price.

So what should I be looking to pay? Are they worth very little and nobody wants them?

The other problem is it measures 39mm x 24mm, so pretty small, & I am quite a big bloke 6ft 4 - will it look ridiculous?

Help / Opinions greatly appreciated.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christopherg
Junior Member
Username: Christopherg

Post Number: 32
Registered: 03-2010

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, July 04, 2010 - 10:35 pm:   

Those cases are certainly lovely, and the small size never bothers me (I'm 6'2"), but I personally draw the line at quartz movements! From a resale point of view, I expect that most collectors share my prejudice, and few would pay meaningful $$$ for one. If one wants nanosecond accuracy, cell phones are good. If one wants a mini-marvel of craftsmanship that will last a century or more, go for a mechanical movement - IMHO, of course!

Cheers,

Chris
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crsuk11
New member
Username: Crsuk11

Post Number: 2
Registered: 07-2010

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, July 04, 2010 - 11:04 pm:   

Hi,

I do agree, and all my present watches are automatic.
However the difference in price between the auto & the quartz is massive. I do not object to spending the money but must at worst break even if I was to sell later.

So do I buy a quartz J le C or would I simply be throwing good money away as they are impossible to sell?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gregb
Advanced Member
Username: Gregb

Post Number: 252
Registered: 10-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, July 04, 2010 - 11:12 pm:   

Ditto what Christopher said. I'm 6'6" and frequently wear smaller sub-35mm watches, but not quartz. And as an investment (with few exceptions, e.g. JLC mechaquartz chronos, etc.), quartz is almost never a good idea.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crsuk11
New member
Username: Crsuk11

Post Number: 3
Registered: 07-2010

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, July 04, 2010 - 11:20 pm:   

Many Thanks & it looks like the Reverso quartz gets the thumbs down.

However, would the 18k & SS case on a new crocodile strap be a reasonable buy at �1,090 or don't touch it and save up for the auto?

Thanks, Richard
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 4628
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, July 05, 2010 - 08:43 am:   

I also think all steel will hold its value better than steel & gold watches.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thomas
Junior Member
Username: Thomas

Post Number: 17
Registered: 12-2009

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 07, 2010 - 08:14 am:   

Hello Richard,

my local watchmaker told me that the JLC Reverso quartz movement (e.g. Cal. 601) should not be mixed up with those cheap quartz movements that can be found in other watches (e.g. Cartier Tank etc.). The Reverso quartz caliber seems to be a mechanical movement in most parts and of a high grade and quality as well (as I have been told).

As well the price stated (GBP 1,090) doesn't seem that high to me for an 18k & SS Reverso.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gregb
Advanced Member
Username: Gregb

Post Number: 307
Registered: 10-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 07, 2010 - 11:02 pm:   

Thomas,

I think you're confusing the JLC 6xx series quartz movements with the JLC Mecaquartz movements. The two are not the same.... apples and oranges.

The JLC 600-series quartz movements found in the Reverso, while not cheap quartz movements, are quite similar in technology to those found in Cartier (your example) and other good brands.

The mechanical/quartz hybrid movement that you mention in your post sounds like the older Mecaquartz movements that JLC used in their Odysseus models (and others) and supplied to IWC. This isn't the movement used in the Reverso quartz.

Hope this clears some of the confusion.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thomas
Junior Member
Username: Thomas

Post Number: 18
Registered: 12-2009

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, September 08, 2010 - 12:23 pm:   

Are there any pictures of the movements Cal. 601 or 602 as can be found in the Reverso quartz watches available?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gregb
Advanced Member
Username: Gregb

Post Number: 308
Registered: 10-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, September 08, 2010 - 02:15 pm:   

Here's a picture of a cal 602 from one of the JLC watches I've had:



Greg
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sensas
Junior Member
Username: Sensas

Post Number: 42
Registered: 05-2008

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, September 16, 2010 - 03:54 am:   

Yes, It's a 602, early 80s (maybe 81-82)