1940s Reverso - no seconds hand Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Classicwatch discussion fora » Jaeger-LeCoultre Forum » Archived messages 2010 » 1940s Reverso - no seconds hand « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christopherg
Junior Member
Username: Christopherg

Post Number: 12
Registered: 03-2010

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, April 09, 2010 - 11:39 pm:   

I have just seen online a watch described as a 1940s vintage Reverso. The dial is signed Jaeger-LeCoultre, but it has no seconds hand at all. The movement is not pictured but is described as '17j manual winding, adjusted 4 positions, monometallic balance, straight line lever'. Is the absence of a seconds hand troubling? Or was that fairly common in the '40s?

Chris
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 4512
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, April 10, 2010 - 07:45 am:   

The no seconds hand model is generally the first variant of the Reverso, most often with just "Reverso" on the dial, so if it's stamped "Jaeger-LeCOultre" on the dial, I'd say it would need a very close look. Something doesn't match up.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christopherg
Junior Member
Username: Christopherg

Post Number: 13
Registered: 03-2010

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, April 10, 2010 - 05:54 pm:   

Thanks, Zaf. As I said, this one purports to be 1940s and otherwise appears to be just that - except for the lack of a centre seconds hand. Case is 18k gold case in a steel frame. Photo attached. What do you think?
rev.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 4514
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, April 11, 2010 - 10:27 am:   

I think it is genuine, but it looks like a 1980s/early 1990s one.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christopherg
Junior Member
Username: Christopherg

Post Number: 14
Registered: 03-2010

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, April 11, 2010 - 01:24 pm:   

Thanks, Zaf - that sounds right to me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christopherg
Junior Member
Username: Christopherg

Post Number: 15
Registered: 03-2010

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 04:34 pm:   

Zaf, you are going to love this. The watch in question was a lot in an online auction catalog, described, as I said, as a 1940s Reverso, but with no picture of the movement. After our conversation above, I contacted the auction house with my concern about the dating of the watch, and requested a photo of the movement. I was assured that it was indeed a 1940s watch, and that a photo would be sent. Lo and behold, when the watch was opened, the movement was a cal. 846 from the 1980s Classic Edition of the watch, just as you predicted. The catalog description is now being corrected. Well done!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 4519
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 05:03 pm:   

That's why they pay me the big bucks.