Author |
Message |
   
Denune
New member Username: Denune
Post Number: 1 Registered: 07-2009
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 - 12:46 pm: | |
[ Link removed ] Please no live ebay links, thanks. (Message edited by admin on July 07, 2009) |
   
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 4049 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 - 01:50 pm: | |
Hi. This is not a place to promote ebay auctions or for live auction links. Sorry, I will remove the link. The back of the watch doesn't look right anyways. Thanks. |
   
Gregb
Intermediate Member Username: Gregb
Post Number: 153 Registered: 10-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, July 08, 2009 - 12:23 pm: | |
I understand what Zaf is saying about the back because it doesn't match the ones he has had. However I've now seen 2 other Quartermasters with this same back (2 in addition to the one being sold by the OP), so I would be more inclined to think this back is correct and just another case version issued by the factory. |
   
Gregb
Intermediate Member Username: Gregb
Post Number: 155 Registered: 10-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, July 08, 2009 - 12:41 pm: | |
A follow-up to my earlier post. I've found pictures on my hard drive of one of the Quartermaster examples I saw that had the same back as the OP:
 |
   
Gregb
Intermediate Member Username: Gregb
Post Number: 156 Registered: 10-2006
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, July 08, 2009 - 12:47 pm: | |
Yet another example that has crossed my bench with the same case & back:
 |
   
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 4051 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, July 08, 2009 - 01:18 pm: | |
Good post thanks. |