The JLC Mark 11 tracking page has bee... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Classicwatch discussion fora » Jaeger-LeCoultre Forum » Archived Messages 2009 » The JLC Mark 11 tracking page has been updated « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 3840
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, March 09, 2009 - 03:32 pm:   

Check it out www.markeleven.com
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ojj
Junior Member
Username: Ojj

Post Number: 31
Registered: 11-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 - 01:10 pm:   

Its a nice page, very nice and useful, some small errors like G6B / 346 104 / 53 which is not in China and havent been for years.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 3841
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 - 02:24 pm:   

I think Paul would be happy to edit, if you email him directly. I think his contact info is on the web site.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Claudio
Junior Member
Username: Claudio

Post Number: 22
Registered: 10-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 - 02:47 pm:   

Hi ,
about dials' variants of these Mark 11 ;
the one identified in the site as 3rd generation RAAF or "flat 3" (I attach a pic bottom from the site) :
was this pattern a JLC factory dial or a MoD reprint ?


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ilja
Moderator
Username: Ilja

Post Number: 264
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 - 03:28 pm:   

Hi Claudio -
The flat 3 variant is a JLC product.
I know for sure since I got one spare dial from them.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ojj
Junior Member
Username: Ojj

Post Number: 32
Registered: 11-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 - 04:45 pm:   

"I think Paul would be happy to edit, if you email him directly. I think his contact info is on the web site"

I did but nothing happened ... then I sold it to US, where I think it still is
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Claudio
Junior Member
Username: Claudio

Post Number: 23
Registered: 10-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 - 05:15 pm:   

Sorry for the 'double track' threading :-)

Thank you Ilja,
that yellow / brownish index must be beautiful when in NOS condition !
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 3842
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, March 10, 2009 - 06:46 pm:   

The real question now arises, Ilja seems to think these later generation dials are JLC printed rather than MoD printed. Thoughts?

He's basing his conclustion on the NOS dial he got from them, but you have to admit, the print quality is worse than the "white 12" version...did the factory print that poorly (by thier standards)? On the other hand, MoD dials are usually *much worse* than these second generation dials, like the Omega RAF from 1953.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Shepcs
New member
Username: Shepcs

Post Number: 1
Registered: 03-2009

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 11, 2009 - 11:22 am:   

Sorry Ojj. Send me where your watch currently resides and I'll be happy to update.

To me its clear the Flat 3s came from JLC. They must have just suffered a quality lapse in my opinion.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ilja
Moderator
Username: Ilja

Post Number: 265
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, March 11, 2009 - 04:30 pm:   

Thanks Paul, I'm actually debatting this issue with Zaf for ages. :-)
We had double proof as far I collect my memory:
1) NOS dials out of LeSentier
2) A bunch of old dials from downunder which had pencil marks with date.
Back when we digged this the issue was crystal clear, at least for you and me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 3844
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, March 12, 2009 - 02:53 am:   

Maybe the MoD specified "crappy print" in the spec. lol.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stefan
Junior Member
Username: Stefan

Post Number: 30
Registered: 03-2007

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, March 12, 2009 - 03:41 am:   

I tend to agree - it's the military, see :-)