Gübelin question Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Classicwatch discussion fora » Jaeger-LeCoultre Forum » Gübelin question « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Norver
New member
Username: Norver

Post Number: 2
Registered: 11-2014

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 08:14 am:   

Hello,

I would very much appreciate any help to find out, should I buy this watch or not?
It has a JLC K825 movement, signed by Gübelin, but the clockface is a classical JLC Memovox.
Movement serial: 1599594 (movement is in fine condition)

It's possible, that this watch originally came out with this face, or it have to be a subsequent amendments?

Thanks in advance, Akos




Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 6198
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 09:46 am:   

I'd expect GUBELIN somewhere on the dial, if the movement says Gubelin. Maybe even a Gubelin Ipsovox dial.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Norver
New member
Username: Norver

Post Number: 3
Registered: 11-2014

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 04:38 am:   

Finally, I bought, it�s such a beauty :-)
You can see more pictures here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fja5fd1v0vs8zv2/AABKJNihgaLzqt4dzlEXgZPya?dl=0

The title on the back inside also strange: it has LeCoultre but Gübelin Ipsovox factory engraving too.

I don't think that this watch came off with this watch face, it is possible of course, but i doubt.
However, replace the watch face isn�t easy or cheap, this intervention not increase the value particularly, why would someone do that?
It seems, this story remain a mystery :-)

But, can you please identify the year of manufacture by this ID-s?
Movement type: K825
Movement serial: 1599594
Case serial: 910379

I would be very grateful :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zaf
Moderator
Username: Zaf

Post Number: 6200
Registered: 05-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, November 20, 2014 - 12:54 pm:   

It would be from around 1964.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rdenney
New member
Username: Rdenney

Post Number: 7
Registered: 08-2014

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, November 21, 2014 - 02:49 pm:   

It could be that the original dial was in such terrible condition that to make the watch usable again, a new or refinished dial was in order. If the watchmaker had a service dial handy, or even a convenient donor watch, that might have been the preferred choice over having it refinished.

Yes, it does hurt the value of the watch as a collectible. But it doesn't hurt it at all as a watch you can wear and enjoy.

Rick "suspecting the purchase price took this into account" Denney
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Norver
New member
Username: Norver

Post Number: 4
Registered: 11-2014

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, November 24, 2014 - 04:40 am:   

�But it doesn't hurt it at all as a watch you can wear and enjoy�
- absolutely agree, that�s why I bought it.
I�m not a collector, I�m going to wear it, and this clockface is one of the most beautiful version of Memovox I've ever seen.

Thank you very much for the comments & informations.