Author |
Message |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Blgg
New member Username: Blgg
Post Number: 28 Registered: 04-2007
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Wednesday, May 09, 2007 - 04:59 pm: | |
Case numbers date this 14k Universal at 1945. The whole watch - case, dial and movement appear in very good shape. The case shines with only a few superficial scratches, yet the case edges are 'new-sharp', as if it has not been aggressively polished. The dial appears accurate, with no off-line hour marks, and minute gradient is symmetrically and evenly located. At high magnification, the line quality does break down... Zaf -- from your experience and gut feeling, does the dial appear 'original' or refinished? Thank you, as always, and best regards.
![1](14963_small.jpg)
![2](14964_small.jpg)
![3](14965_small.jpg)
![4](14966_small.jpg)
![5](14967_small.jpg)
![6](14968_small.jpg) |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Zaf
Moderator Username: Zaf
Post Number: 2591 Registered: 05-2003
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, May 10, 2007 - 02:38 pm: | |
Looks like a redial to me. |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Blgg
New member Username: Blgg
Post Number: 29 Registered: 04-2007
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Thursday, May 10, 2007 - 03:06 pm: | |
Thank you again. I biased that direction as well.. and sent it back. Pretty piece to the naked eye, though... Best regards |
![Top of page](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](https://www.classicwatch.com/discus/icons/tree_m.gif)
Rolokr
Junior Member Username: Rolokr
Post Number: 11 Registered: 01-2008
Rating: N/A Votes: 0 (Vote!) | Posted on Friday, June 13, 2008 - 01:29 am: | |
It is a redial. Original dial that old has patina, sometimes dirty, fading etc... |
|